Hybrid process of machining of high speed/machining laser for the manufacture of moulds
Fundación Tekniker15/11/2006
The mould makers suffer increasingly greater demands by the end customer, quality, accuracy, and cost of the final piece. This implies that they are constantly searching for solutions for the improvement of the manufacturing process. At the same time, machine tool manufacturers are introducing new technologies to obtain machines hybrid, able to carry out operations of various kinds in the same machine.
Although the current cutting tools far outweigh the limitations that had a few years ago, and can readily available tools for milling of diameters of up to 0.5mm, the requirements of machines for these tools are very high. In addition, may wear and/or tool breakage may occur, or does not maximize production rates.
The laser beam has the great advantage of being a tool of work without contact, of very small diameter, which does not suffer breakage or wear during the machining process.
Combining the machining and laser technologies on a single machine, you get a hybrid machine able to carry out supplementary operations among themselves. The DMU60L machine Deckel Maho, available in Tekniker is a clear example of hybrid machine milling / laser.
This article contains the study carried out in the search and obtain the most appropriate process parameters of laser machining. Identify these parameters and relate to the results. The presented study is a study that was carried out specifically for the DMU60l machine.
Planning a comprehensive battery of experiments, which are intended to identify the parameters that have the best result in their finish piece (less roughness), and machining time (less time machining).
Experimental procedure
Available equipment
Head of high speed milling
Laser system
The laser head has:
• Transducer: it allows to measure machined depth.
• House of vision: allow the precise placement of the piece.
• Scanner mirror: creates a workspace of approximately 70 mm 2.
When you need a larger work area, the machine performs displacement in its X-Y axes, according to the needs of the laser beam.
You have the option of choosing the size of the diameter of the beam:
• Small: 40 ° m.
• Large: 100th m.
Software
At the same time, machining programs are created using the LPSWin application.
This application allows, as shown in Figure 2, on the basis of a CAD (3D volume) file, create "tpf" files containing machining strategies and process parameters assigned, by layers. Finally, some "l4d" programs, which create strokes compatible with machine laser are created.
Study of the process
Material
The test tubes is rectangular, with dimensions 80 x 70 x 20 mm, enabling his later characterization in the electronic scanning microscope (SEM) and in the confocal microscope.
Experimental procedure
The procedure followed in the conduct of the experimentation is in the definition of initial parameters of process, provided by the manufacturer, that will be optimized according to the results obtained.
The aim is that the time of machining and roughness values are as small as possible.
Of all process parameters, are chosen as independent variables to consider:
• Thickness of layer.
• Distance between beams.
• Speed of the beam.
Describes a circle of 5 mm in diameter as a geometric shape machining.
Prior to the machining of the circle, carried out a search of technology, where the parameters (frequency, intensity, parameter First Pulse Killer (FPK)) are adjusted to the material object of study.
Analyzing trends, and results achieved, will have been adjusting parameters to obtain suitable roughness values.
As regards the characterisation of the test tubes, through a Perfilometer without contact of the PL ° brand have obtained images confocal that allow to measure the roughness.
At the same time, through the electronic scanning microscope JEOL JSM-5600LV, have been obtained photographs of the surface quality.
Experimental results
Because the initially proposed objective was to improve the rugosida, to note that different value of depth of machining, the value of the obtained roughness varies, most of the experimentation has been done with a depth of 0, 2 mm.
The initial process parameters are indicated by the manufacturer of the machine for a common steel, and are contained in table 1.
After extensive experimentation, you get a set of parameters, which obtain a Ra of approximately 1 m. Figure 5 shows an image corresponding to this value of roughness.
There have been different groups of parameters of process give us a roughness of approximately 1 m, having the machining time difference between them. Machining time varies from 25 minutes to 42 minutes.
At the same time, the shorter machining time is achieved with a combination of parameters which presents a surface roughness of approximately 3.4 ° m, which is shown in the image of Figure 6.
For machining in less time, there are a few holes on the machined surface.
Mold Machining example
Part of the mold is machined using cutting tool, making a first roughing operation, and a later finishing. Complete machining by means of the laser beam.
The following tables and figures show the used process parameters, and images of the mold at different stages of manufacture.
Cylindrical tool of hard metal from Ø2mm, with 4 cutting edges
Cylindrical tool of hard metal of Ø 1 mm, 2 cutting edges
Spherical tool of hard metal of Ø 1 mm, 2 cutting edges
Conclusions
The operation of high speed milling achieves a high startup rate, while the mechanized laser allows to get small complex figures.
Anyway, it is necessary to carry out a feasibility study for each of the pieces of interest, because the laser is a very slow process, and is not valid for machining depths from 5 mm.
As particular conclusions of the process are obtained, after analyzing the trends followed by the results depending on the parameters, they are:
Roughness
• To lower value of distance between beams, lower is the value of the roughness.
• Speed not affect much the value of the roughness.
• Roughness obtained with larger diameter beam, is worse than with small diameter.
• To shallower depths of machining, minor is the roughness.
Time
• The machining time is less, when the thickness and the distance between beams is greater.