Of the conveyor to the production of flexible workflow
December 23, 2008
Due to technological developments and a variable market, the production process has changed significantly since then. "Material flow optimal, even shorter delivery time, under stock and therefore maximum efficiency." "This is the wish that it dominates the industry, and is motivating us to us," says Alfred Schiffer, director manager of Boy. These days, the manufacturing industry dominates the production of flexible workflow. This is much less complex and easier to control.
"By what refers to the automation and economic production, we have always been among the first, both for our production processes and our product design." "From the beginning, this has been our motto to always be on top of technological development", says Alfred Schiffer. "Until these days, we have been faithful to this principle, and we will continue to be so to leave a lasting mark on the market through permanent optimization." "Our latest enhancements are not bad at all".
The production of flexible flow has altered the processes of installation, the planning of production and the control of the material. Because the process is governed more by current demand that a rigid catalogue, ensures that the manufactured article exactly meets the customer's specifications and delivery requirements. Synchronized production processes ensure that the necessary parts for the Assembly are in the right place at the right time, and to comply with the required quality. Clearly, this approach greatly simplifies all production processes and reduces the time needed to comply with every step of the process.
Currently in Boy production of flexible flow has created a process of enabling editing for the quality and dynamism. Some additional benefits are:
-Variable Output.
-They can disconnect individual machines of the conveyor belt.
-The material can navigate without obstruction by the conveyor belt.
-Be designed ergonomic work units.
-Possible best price / rate of development.
The redesign process has paid off. Production is much more transparent, the problems have been resolved and it has reduced the time required for corrective actions, and the Assembly and process times for the machines have become shorter.